The more things change, the more they remain... insane.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
This Is The Best. So Kita Renung-Renungkan.
Sesungguhnya
Tidak ada yang lebih menyayat
Dari melihat bangsaku dijajah
Tidak ada yang lebih menyedihkan
Dari membiarkan bangsaku dihina
Aku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Aku pasti bukan aku seorang saja yang nampak
Ada juga bercadang bertanya tuan punya
Tapi bercampur risau dengan tak tergamak
Nanti dikata tak bersyukur, dikata tak sedar diri
Jadi aku menyendiri, memerhati dan akhirnya mengakui
Yang kita sendiri
Membiarkan bunga raya melayu ke kanan
Dan dibiar bunga tak cantik mekar di kiri
Aku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Tanah air kita yang punya
Kita siram, kita baja tapi angin api kita lupa
Mereka merancang masa menjilat bangsa
13 harimau bertukar menjadi mangsa
Kita lupa nenek moyang kaya-raya
Jangan sekali-kali digadai harta-bendanya
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Takkan Melayu hilang di dunia
Ya... tapi apa guna tak hilang di dunia
Kalau kewujudan tidak dirasa
Petah berbahasa kudrat tak berjasa
Orang berbudi kita hanya tahu merasa
Selalu lari bila dirapat
Selalu malu bila soalan diaju
Selalu segan memberi pendapat
Rela mengikut dari meneraju
Belum nyanyi sudah bersorak
Suka berjanji dalam borak
Bukan kata tak ada otak
Cuma tak berfikir di luar kotak
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Ku lihat layu dalam Melayu
Aku jadi sayu
Bunga menangis dia mendayu
Mahu jadi cantik tetapi ragu
Aku merayu
Bangunlah semula hidup kembali
Jangan tunggu matahari mati
Cepatlah mekar sebelum terlerai
Perjuangan kita belum selesai
Perjuangan kita belum selesai
Perjuangan kita belum selesai
Perjuangan kita belum selesai
Kerana hanya yang cekal dan tabah
Dapat membina mercu tanda bangsanya yang berjaya
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
They Are Back.
They are back. I have been waiting for the band to re-form from what...???Since i was still in school.. Now they are back... Cool...Go Cornell..
By the they new song from Marvel THE AVENGERS Soundtrack (Live To Rise)
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Today Lesson.
Assalamulaikum.
Aku dok tgk skang ni ramai sangat suka dok bertelagah same sendiri. Buat malu bangsa Melayu. Buat malu Islam.
Few day back ade la kat FB ari tu. Umur baru setahun jagung dah nak bicara pasal so called POILITIK. Dah pandai cakap pasal HIDUP. Dah pandai nak cakap ORANG LAIN TAK BETUL. Dah pandai nak SINDIR ORANG. Aku boleh nampak orang zaman skang ni nak ikut main ikut je. Tak ada nak kaji dulu. Main masuk buta buta je info yang mereka dapat. Tak ada nak revise balik semua info tu.
SO JUST NAK BAGI DIORG BUKAK MATE DAN KEPALA MEREKA NI.. MARI KITA KONGSIKAN BERSAMA.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD GOVERNMENT
What is the PROTOCOL OF ZION?
The term "protocols" in this text refers to the recorded minutes of a series of meetings which took place among the innermost circle of Zion elders. The term also implies a blueprint or strategy to follow in order to achieve the desired goals stated here. The minutes of these meetings were either originally issued at the First Zionist Congress held in in Basel, Switzerland (spelled Basle at the time) in 1897, or they were re-issued at that Congress. The Zionist Congress was headed up by Theodore Herzl who held subsequent Zionist congresses on almost a yearly basis until 1913, and then resumed again in 1921. The ideas and beliefs expressed in these protocols are so hideous and repugnant to the sensibilities of any normal person of good will, that the British translator, Victor Marsden, could only work on translating the 1905 Russian text of the Protocols for one hour per day due to his revulsion with the concepts being promoted. The people who embrace these concepts consider themselves a special and separate category of humanity who were chosen by "God" to rule over all other men on this planet and establish a simple two tier feudal society: one with elites at the top and worker serfs below them. They consider non-Jews to be the equivalent of cattle and therefore afford no more concern for the "rights" of the subhuman Goyim than one would grant to a herd of steer or sheep.
Chapter 1. The Basic Doctrine.
Right lies in Might. Freedom an idea only. Liberalism. Gold. Faith. Self-Government. Despotism of Capital. The internal foe. The Mob. Anarchy. Politics versus Morals. The Right of the strong. The Invincibility of Jew-Masonic authority. End justifies Means. The Mob a Blind Man.Political A.B.C. Party Discord. Most satisfactory form of rule-Despotism. Alcohol. Classicism. Corruption. Principles and rules of the Jew-Masonic Government. Terror. ''Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.'' Principle of Dynastic Rule.Annihilation of the privileges of the Goy-Aristocracy (i.e.,non-Jew). The New Aristocracy. The psychological calculation. Abstractness of "Liberty." Power of removal of representatives of the people.
Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light upon surrounding facts. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from the two point[s] of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim (i.e., non-Jews). It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare. What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served for their guidance hitherto? In the beginnings of the structure of society they were subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards -- to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in force. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears: the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism. In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes -- in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not -- it goes to the bottom. Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral I would put the following questions: -- If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible? Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favour with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, customs, traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, put forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have resource both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim,but we must in no wise be guided by them. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you. Where does right begin? Where does it end? In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invisible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakeable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught. In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and unreasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin. Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet. A people left to itself i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom, Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable, for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.
It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is a savage and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery. Behold the alcoholized animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents -- by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the goyim. In the number of these last I count also the so-called "society ladies," voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury. Our countersign is Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease.
Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since those days by stupid poll-parrots who from all sides round flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness; did not note the contradiction of their meaning and interrelation: did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political -- to all these things the goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the wellbeing of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph; it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card -- the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.
Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man: and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.
So kite tengok ape yang same dengan ape yg beza dgn ape yang dikatakan politik.
To be Continue. -> Chapter 2.
SO JUST NAK BAGI DIORG BUKAK MATE DAN KEPALA MEREKA NI.. MARI KITA KONGSIKAN BERSAMA.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD GOVERNMENT
What is the PROTOCOL OF ZION?
The term "protocols" in this text refers to the recorded minutes of a series of meetings which took place among the innermost circle of Zion elders. The term also implies a blueprint or strategy to follow in order to achieve the desired goals stated here. The minutes of these meetings were either originally issued at the First Zionist Congress held in in Basel, Switzerland (spelled Basle at the time) in 1897, or they were re-issued at that Congress. The Zionist Congress was headed up by Theodore Herzl who held subsequent Zionist congresses on almost a yearly basis until 1913, and then resumed again in 1921. The ideas and beliefs expressed in these protocols are so hideous and repugnant to the sensibilities of any normal person of good will, that the British translator, Victor Marsden, could only work on translating the 1905 Russian text of the Protocols for one hour per day due to his revulsion with the concepts being promoted. The people who embrace these concepts consider themselves a special and separate category of humanity who were chosen by "God" to rule over all other men on this planet and establish a simple two tier feudal society: one with elites at the top and worker serfs below them. They consider non-Jews to be the equivalent of cattle and therefore afford no more concern for the "rights" of the subhuman Goyim than one would grant to a herd of steer or sheep.
Chapter 1. The Basic Doctrine.
Right lies in Might. Freedom an idea only. Liberalism. Gold. Faith. Self-Government. Despotism of Capital. The internal foe. The Mob. Anarchy. Politics versus Morals. The Right of the strong. The Invincibility of Jew-Masonic authority. End justifies Means. The Mob a Blind Man.Political A.B.C. Party Discord. Most satisfactory form of rule-Despotism. Alcohol. Classicism. Corruption. Principles and rules of the Jew-Masonic Government. Terror. ''Liberty, Equality, Fraternity.'' Principle of Dynastic Rule.Annihilation of the privileges of the Goy-Aristocracy (i.e.,non-Jew). The New Aristocracy. The psychological calculation. Abstractness of "Liberty." Power of removal of representatives of the people.
Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we shall throw light upon surrounding facts. What I am about to set forth, then, is our system from the two point[s] of view, that of ourselves and that of the goyim (i.e., non-Jews). It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more in number than the good, and therefore the best results in governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of all for the sake of securing their own welfare. What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men? What has served for their guidance hitherto? In the beginnings of the structure of society they were subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards -- to Law, which is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by the law of nature right lies in force. Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one's party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority. This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears: the slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the old already weakened by liberalism. In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled. The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a people to self-government for a certain length of time for that people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes. Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions, whether its internal discord brings it under the power of external foes -- in any case it can be accounted irretrievably lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State, willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not -- it goes to the bottom. Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as the above are immoral I would put the following questions: -- If every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible? Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more favour with the people, whose powers of reasoning are superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, customs, traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance of political secrets, put forth some ridiculous resolution that lays in the administration a seed of anarchy. The political has nothing in common with the moral. The ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician, and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule must have resource both to cunning and to make-believe. Great national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim,but we must in no wise be guided by them. Our right lies in force. The word "right" is an abstract thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that I am stronger than you. Where does right begin? Where does it end? In any State in which there is a bad organization of authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying out of liberalism, I find a new right to attack by the right of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their liberalism. Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of power will be more invisible than any other, because it will remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it. Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit will emerge the good of an unshakeable rule, which will restore the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us, however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful. Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught. In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless and unreasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin. Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can have understanding of the words that can be made up of the political alphabet. A people left to itself i.e., to upstarts from its midst, brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom, Is it possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable, for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible and impossible of execution.
It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a satisfactory form of government for any country is one that concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide, whosoever that person may be. The mob is a savage and displays its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself is the highest degree of savagery. Behold the alcoholized animals, bemused with drink, the right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has been inducted by our special agents -- by tutors, lackeys, governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others, by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the goyim. In the number of these last I count also the so-called "society ladies," voluntary followers of the others in corruption and luxury. Our countersign is Force and Make-believe. Only force conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and sovereignty. Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease.
Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since those days by stupid poll-parrots who from all sides round flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness; did not note the contradiction of their meaning and interrelation: did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political -- to all these things the goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause. In all corners of the earth the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity" brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the wellbeing of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya States. As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph; it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card -- the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which our learned elders provide the motive force.
Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material needs of man: and each one of these human weaknesses, taken alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their activities. The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove. It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it were, given us the power of appointment.
So kite tengok ape yang same dengan ape yg beza dgn ape yang dikatakan politik.
To be Continue. -> Chapter 2.
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
A@#!&*e of the day..
Friday, March 16, 2012
Team Building Course
HI We from A2Z Enterprise Offer You A Team Building Course You Probably Never Think Of.
Paintball Team Bulding
Paintball has proven to be an extremely popular activity for corporate events, as well as other types of group days out, because paintball is excellent for team building. Paintball is designed to engage a team in an activity which demands various skills and techniques.
In working together to combat the opponent, a paintball team develops communication skills, planning, cooperation, decision-making and effective use of resources. In this way, the consolidation of a team throughout a paintball game proves to be one of the best team-building activities. This new approach to facilitation and experiential education combines the thrilling experience of a paintball game with the sequenced facilitation of an educational adventure.
Call for Enquiry or Booking.
Zaharin 0124598780
Azim Shah 0192504480
Paintball Team Bulding
Paintball has proven to be an extremely popular activity for corporate events, as well as other types of group days out, because paintball is excellent for team building. Paintball is designed to engage a team in an activity which demands various skills and techniques.
In working together to combat the opponent, a paintball team develops communication skills, planning, cooperation, decision-making and effective use of resources. In this way, the consolidation of a team throughout a paintball game proves to be one of the best team-building activities. This new approach to facilitation and experiential education combines the thrilling experience of a paintball game with the sequenced facilitation of an educational adventure.
Call for Enquiry or Booking.
Zaharin 0124598780
Azim Shah 0192504480
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Syiah..
Aku ade bace about syiah ni. Aku tau syiah ni agak menyimpang so i just wanted to know ape pegangan org2 syiah ni. Then i started to look around and this is what i found.
Golongan Syiah Berpecah Kepada Beberapa Kumpulan.
1)Syiah Imam 12 (Ja'fariyah) - Mostly In Iran
2)Syiah Zaidiyah (Syiah Imam 5) - Mostly In Yaman
3)Syiah Ismailiyah (Imam Tujuh) - Center In India.
Di Malaysia Terdapat 3 kumpulan syiah.
1)Syiah Taiyibi Bohra (Dawood Bohra)
2)Syiah Ismailiyah Agha Khan
3)Syiah Ja'fariyah @ Imamiah Itna Assyariyyah.(Imam 12)
Kitab2 Syiah.
1. Kasyf Al-Asrar (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
2. Al-Hukumah Al-Islamiyah (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
3. Al-Sab'ah Min Al-Salaf (Ayatullah Al Murtadza Az-Zubaidi)
4. Al-Usul Min Al-Kafi (Sheikh Muhammad Bin Yacoob Al-Kulaini - Thn 1338H)
5. Tahrir Al-Wasilah (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
6. Al-Muraja'at (Sheikh Abdul Hussin Syarafudin Al-Musnawi)
7. Peshawar Nights (Sayyid Muhammad Rais Al-Wahidin)
8. Mafatih Al-Jinan (Sheikh Abbas Al-Qummi)
9. Minhaj Kebenaran Dan Pendedahannya (Fiqh 5 Mazhab Di Antara Nas Dan Ijtihad)
(Hassan Bin Yusuf Al-Mutahhar Al-Hulliyy, Diterjemahkan oleh Prof Madya Dr. Lutpi Ibrahim - Thn 1993)
10. Mengapakah Aku Memilih Ahlul Bait A.S? (Syeikh Muhammad Mar'i Al-Amin Al-Antali Diterjemahkan oleh Prof Madya Dr. Lutpi Ibrahim - Thn 1993)
11. Al-Sahabah (Haidar)
12. Ahlu Al-Bait (Dr. Mahfuz Mohamed)
Ajaran dan fahaman syiah adalah bercanggah dan menyeleweng dari pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama'ah.
Antara Fahaman Dan Pegangan Syiah.
**(Ulasan - Pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama'ah)
1. Khalifah Diwasiatkan Secara nas.
- Syiah mempercayayi imam-imam telah ditentukan oleh Allah melalui lisan Rasulnya secara nas.
(Ulasan - Tidak terdapat nas dari Al-Quran atau hadith sahih yang jelas maksudnya bahawa Saidina Ali ditentukan sbg khalifah selepas wafatnya Baginda S.A.W)
2. Imam Adalah Maksum
- Syiah meyakini bahawa imam-imam adalah maksum iaitu terpelihara dari dosa kecil dan besar dari peringkat kanak2 sehinggalah meninggal dunia. Tidak melakukakn kesalahan da tidak lupa.
(Ulasan - Jelas dalam Al-Quran bahawa yang maksum hanyalah para rasul dan abia' sahaja.)
3. Ilmu Allah Berubah-Ubah Mengikut Suatu Peristiwa yang Berlaku Kepada Manusia.
- Mengikut Akidah Syiah, Al-Bada' ialah "Allah Mengetahui Sesuatu Perkara Setalah Berlaku, Peristiwa Berkenaan Yang Sebelum Itu Dianggap Tersembunyi Daripada-Nya"
(Ulasan - Ini adalah bertentangan dengan Al-Quran ang menyebut Allah mengetahui secara terperinci dan menyeluruh seperti mana yang dijelaskan oleh ayat berikut "Allah mengetahui pengkhianatan (Keserongan da ketiadaan jujur) pandangan mata seseorang, Serta mengetahui akan apa yang tersembunyi di dalam hati" Surah Al-Mu'min ayat 19)
4. Mengkafirkan Para Sahabat Rasulullah S.A.W.
- Syiah mempercayai bahawa selepas wafatnya Rasulullah S.A.W semua sahabat MURTAD kecuali Ahlul Bait dan beberapa orang sahabat termasuk Abu Dzar, Miqdad Bin Aswad, Salman Al-Farisi dan Ammar.
(Dalam Al-Quran dan Hadith ada mengatakan tentnag ke-adilan dan sanjungan para sahabat yang membersihkan mereka dari sebarang tuduhan yang tidak benar.
Sabda Nabi S.A.W :
Dari Abu Hurairah R.A katanya; Rasulullah S.A.W bersabda :
"Jangan Kamu Mencaci Sahabat-Sahabatku, demi Allah nyawaku berada dalam kekuasan-Nya, Sekiranya seseorang kamu membelanjakan emas sebesar bukit uhud (maka perbelanjaan itu tidak dapat menyamai) secupak atau setengah cupak yang dibelanjakan oleh para sahabat".
Riwayat Bukhari Dan Muslim)
5. Penyanjungan Yang Kterlaluan Kepadan Saidina Ali.
- Syiah menyanjungi Saidina Ali berlebih-lebihan sehingga disamatarafkan dengan Rasulullah S.A.W. Bahkan dianggap lebih tinggi lagi.
(Ulasan - Tidak terdapat dalam Al-Quran atau hadith sahih yang menyatakan Saidina Ali mempunyai martabat seperti Rasulullah S.A.W. Nama Saidina Ali tidak terdapat di-dalam Al-Quran kerana beliau bukan seorang nabi atau rasul, tetapi hanya sebagai sahabat dan menantu Rasulullah S.A.W yang dijamin masuk syurga.)
6. Menghalalkan dan Mengamalkan Nikah Mut'ah.
**Nikah Mut'ah = Nikah dengan tempoh tertentu yang dipersetuji kedua pasangan samada setahun, sebulan atau sehari(boleh juga dilakukan dalam temph 1 atau dua jam, 1 atau 2 hari atau semalaman)dengan mask kahwin ang tertentu.
- Menurut syiah nikah Mut'ah adalah diharuksn.
(Ulasan - Nikah Mut'ah telah diharamkan oleh Nabi Muhammad S.A.W buat selama-lamanya hingga hari kiamat. Dari Ali Bin Abu Talib Katanya: " Bahawa Rasulullah S.A.W melarang Nikah Mut'ah pada hari perperangan Khaibar dan juga memakan daging Keldai Jinak"
Riwayat Ibnu Majah Dan Al-Nasai
Nikah Mut'ah bukan suatu pernikahan dalam islam malah merupakan amalan jahiliyah. Perempuan yang dinikahkan Mut'ah bukanlah isteri atau hamba, tidak boleh mewarisi, tidak sabit nasab dan tidak wajib nafkah. Saidina Umar berkata "Nikah Mut'ah merosakkan konsep Nikah, Talak, Iddah dan Pesaka.)
7. Menambah Syahadah.
- Golongan Syiah menambah nama Saidina Ali dalam syahadah selepas nama nabi Muhammad S.A.W. (Contoh : Ash hadu An la Illahaillallah, Wa ash hadu anna muhammadarasulullah, wa as hadu anna ali amirul mukminin.
(Ulasan - Ini jelas bertentangan dengan Al-Quran dan Sunnah. Syahadah hanyalah Kepada Allah dan Rasulnya sahaja tidak kepada Saidina Ali.
Sabda Rasulullah S.A.W yang bermaksud : Islam itu dibina atas 5 perkara iaitu mengaku bawaha tiada Tuhan melainkan Allah dan Bahawasanya Nabi Muhammad itu pesuruh Allah, Solat 5 waktu, Mengeluarkan zakat, Puasa Dibulan Ramadhan dan menunaikan haji.
Riwayat Ahmad,Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi dan Al-Nasai.)
Actually ada lagi tapi aku letak main point which we all can see what wrong.
Hanya Allah Yang Maha Mengetahui.
Yang baik Datangnya Dari Allah dan yang buruk datangnya dari aku sendiri.
Aku hanya menjalankan tanggungjawab sebagai orang islam terhadap saudara islamku yang lain bagi manjaga Agama yang sebenar-benar agama.
Kalau ada yang tersalah minta perbetulkan aku suapaya aku lebih berhati2 di kemudian ari.
Sesamela kite hindari jaran Syiah ni sedangkan Rasulullah pernah berkata "Umatku akan berpecah kepada 73 bahagian dan hanya 1 bahagian yang akan mendapat syafaatku"
Lebih kurang macam tu la.
Assalamualaikum.
Golongan Syiah Berpecah Kepada Beberapa Kumpulan.
1)Syiah Imam 12 (Ja'fariyah) - Mostly In Iran
2)Syiah Zaidiyah (Syiah Imam 5) - Mostly In Yaman
3)Syiah Ismailiyah (Imam Tujuh) - Center In India.
Di Malaysia Terdapat 3 kumpulan syiah.
1)Syiah Taiyibi Bohra (Dawood Bohra)
2)Syiah Ismailiyah Agha Khan
3)Syiah Ja'fariyah @ Imamiah Itna Assyariyyah.(Imam 12)
Kitab2 Syiah.
1. Kasyf Al-Asrar (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
2. Al-Hukumah Al-Islamiyah (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
3. Al-Sab'ah Min Al-Salaf (Ayatullah Al Murtadza Az-Zubaidi)
4. Al-Usul Min Al-Kafi (Sheikh Muhammad Bin Yacoob Al-Kulaini - Thn 1338H)
5. Tahrir Al-Wasilah (Ayatullah Al Khomeini)
6. Al-Muraja'at (Sheikh Abdul Hussin Syarafudin Al-Musnawi)
7. Peshawar Nights (Sayyid Muhammad Rais Al-Wahidin)
8. Mafatih Al-Jinan (Sheikh Abbas Al-Qummi)
9. Minhaj Kebenaran Dan Pendedahannya (Fiqh 5 Mazhab Di Antara Nas Dan Ijtihad)
(Hassan Bin Yusuf Al-Mutahhar Al-Hulliyy, Diterjemahkan oleh Prof Madya Dr. Lutpi Ibrahim - Thn 1993)
10. Mengapakah Aku Memilih Ahlul Bait A.S? (Syeikh Muhammad Mar'i Al-Amin Al-Antali Diterjemahkan oleh Prof Madya Dr. Lutpi Ibrahim - Thn 1993)
11. Al-Sahabah (Haidar)
12. Ahlu Al-Bait (Dr. Mahfuz Mohamed)
Ajaran dan fahaman syiah adalah bercanggah dan menyeleweng dari pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama'ah.
Antara Fahaman Dan Pegangan Syiah.
**(Ulasan - Pegangan Ahli Sunnah Wal Jama'ah)
1. Khalifah Diwasiatkan Secara nas.
- Syiah mempercayayi imam-imam telah ditentukan oleh Allah melalui lisan Rasulnya secara nas.
(Ulasan - Tidak terdapat nas dari Al-Quran atau hadith sahih yang jelas maksudnya bahawa Saidina Ali ditentukan sbg khalifah selepas wafatnya Baginda S.A.W)
2. Imam Adalah Maksum
- Syiah meyakini bahawa imam-imam adalah maksum iaitu terpelihara dari dosa kecil dan besar dari peringkat kanak2 sehinggalah meninggal dunia. Tidak melakukakn kesalahan da tidak lupa.
(Ulasan - Jelas dalam Al-Quran bahawa yang maksum hanyalah para rasul dan abia' sahaja.)
3. Ilmu Allah Berubah-Ubah Mengikut Suatu Peristiwa yang Berlaku Kepada Manusia.
- Mengikut Akidah Syiah, Al-Bada' ialah "Allah Mengetahui Sesuatu Perkara Setalah Berlaku, Peristiwa Berkenaan Yang Sebelum Itu Dianggap Tersembunyi Daripada-Nya"
(Ulasan - Ini adalah bertentangan dengan Al-Quran ang menyebut Allah mengetahui secara terperinci dan menyeluruh seperti mana yang dijelaskan oleh ayat berikut "Allah mengetahui pengkhianatan (Keserongan da ketiadaan jujur) pandangan mata seseorang, Serta mengetahui akan apa yang tersembunyi di dalam hati" Surah Al-Mu'min ayat 19)
4. Mengkafirkan Para Sahabat Rasulullah S.A.W.
- Syiah mempercayai bahawa selepas wafatnya Rasulullah S.A.W semua sahabat MURTAD kecuali Ahlul Bait dan beberapa orang sahabat termasuk Abu Dzar, Miqdad Bin Aswad, Salman Al-Farisi dan Ammar.
(Dalam Al-Quran dan Hadith ada mengatakan tentnag ke-adilan dan sanjungan para sahabat yang membersihkan mereka dari sebarang tuduhan yang tidak benar.
Sabda Nabi S.A.W :
Dari Abu Hurairah R.A katanya; Rasulullah S.A.W bersabda :
"Jangan Kamu Mencaci Sahabat-Sahabatku, demi Allah nyawaku berada dalam kekuasan-Nya, Sekiranya seseorang kamu membelanjakan emas sebesar bukit uhud (maka perbelanjaan itu tidak dapat menyamai) secupak atau setengah cupak yang dibelanjakan oleh para sahabat".
Riwayat Bukhari Dan Muslim)
5. Penyanjungan Yang Kterlaluan Kepadan Saidina Ali.
- Syiah menyanjungi Saidina Ali berlebih-lebihan sehingga disamatarafkan dengan Rasulullah S.A.W. Bahkan dianggap lebih tinggi lagi.
(Ulasan - Tidak terdapat dalam Al-Quran atau hadith sahih yang menyatakan Saidina Ali mempunyai martabat seperti Rasulullah S.A.W. Nama Saidina Ali tidak terdapat di-dalam Al-Quran kerana beliau bukan seorang nabi atau rasul, tetapi hanya sebagai sahabat dan menantu Rasulullah S.A.W yang dijamin masuk syurga.)
6. Menghalalkan dan Mengamalkan Nikah Mut'ah.
**Nikah Mut'ah = Nikah dengan tempoh tertentu yang dipersetuji kedua pasangan samada setahun, sebulan atau sehari(boleh juga dilakukan dalam temph 1 atau dua jam, 1 atau 2 hari atau semalaman)dengan mask kahwin ang tertentu.
- Menurut syiah nikah Mut'ah adalah diharuksn.
(Ulasan - Nikah Mut'ah telah diharamkan oleh Nabi Muhammad S.A.W buat selama-lamanya hingga hari kiamat. Dari Ali Bin Abu Talib Katanya: " Bahawa Rasulullah S.A.W melarang Nikah Mut'ah pada hari perperangan Khaibar dan juga memakan daging Keldai Jinak"
Riwayat Ibnu Majah Dan Al-Nasai
Nikah Mut'ah bukan suatu pernikahan dalam islam malah merupakan amalan jahiliyah. Perempuan yang dinikahkan Mut'ah bukanlah isteri atau hamba, tidak boleh mewarisi, tidak sabit nasab dan tidak wajib nafkah. Saidina Umar berkata "Nikah Mut'ah merosakkan konsep Nikah, Talak, Iddah dan Pesaka.)
7. Menambah Syahadah.
- Golongan Syiah menambah nama Saidina Ali dalam syahadah selepas nama nabi Muhammad S.A.W. (Contoh : Ash hadu An la Illahaillallah, Wa ash hadu anna muhammadarasulullah, wa as hadu anna ali amirul mukminin.
(Ulasan - Ini jelas bertentangan dengan Al-Quran dan Sunnah. Syahadah hanyalah Kepada Allah dan Rasulnya sahaja tidak kepada Saidina Ali.
Sabda Rasulullah S.A.W yang bermaksud : Islam itu dibina atas 5 perkara iaitu mengaku bawaha tiada Tuhan melainkan Allah dan Bahawasanya Nabi Muhammad itu pesuruh Allah, Solat 5 waktu, Mengeluarkan zakat, Puasa Dibulan Ramadhan dan menunaikan haji.
Riwayat Ahmad,Al-Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi dan Al-Nasai.)
Actually ada lagi tapi aku letak main point which we all can see what wrong.
Hanya Allah Yang Maha Mengetahui.
Yang baik Datangnya Dari Allah dan yang buruk datangnya dari aku sendiri.
Aku hanya menjalankan tanggungjawab sebagai orang islam terhadap saudara islamku yang lain bagi manjaga Agama yang sebenar-benar agama.
Kalau ada yang tersalah minta perbetulkan aku suapaya aku lebih berhati2 di kemudian ari.
Sesamela kite hindari jaran Syiah ni sedangkan Rasulullah pernah berkata "Umatku akan berpecah kepada 73 bahagian dan hanya 1 bahagian yang akan mendapat syafaatku"
Lebih kurang macam tu la.
Assalamualaikum.
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
What Happen To Malaysia????
What the hell happen to Malaysia?
Aku bukan benci Malaysia. Aku sayang tanah air aku. Tapi sekarang ni aku tengok most of these idiotic people in Malaysia are making it much more worse then ever. Adoiiiii.... Sudah-sudah la tu. Ca Ya Nun Alif ni pun satu hal la.. Da menumpang tu buat la cara menumpang. You don't have any single right to blame our people. Our business is non of your damn bunsiness.

Terjemahan:
23 NOVEMBER 2011
11:28PM BUTTER LAU MEREKA DENGKI DENGAN KEJAYAAN ORANG LAIN. APA BEZANYA ORANG MELAYU DENGAN PENCURI?
24 NOVEMBER 2011
1:37AM DESMOND TEE DESMOND PERGI MATI MELAYU BABI! TAK ADA KELEBIHAN! JADI MEREKA MENCURI!! ORANG MELAYU LOWCLASS!!
2:49PM BECKY WONG TANPA ORANG CINA YANG MEMBANTU ORANG MELAYU, BOLEH KE MEREKA HIDUP SAMPAI SEKARANG? AMBIL BALIK DUIT YANG PERNAH KITA BAGI, SEMUA BABI-BABI INI TAK KAN MAMPU BUAT APA-APA. TAK LAMA LAGI MEREKA AKAN TAHU AKIBATNYA. MANA ADA 1 MALAYSIA, SEMUANYA TIPU! MEREKA SURUH TOLAK DISKRIMINASI KAUM TAPI MEREKA YANG MENGAMALKANNYA??
5:14PM STEVEN LONG MATILAH MELAYU BABI GEMUK MAK DIA!!
-------------------------------------------------
What the F*&% is this you damn communist inheritance. Just remember where are you standing now. Just remember where are you living now. Just remember where you came from. Don't just barging in like you know everything. As long as you in Malaysia. As long as it call Malaysia. As long as the "Malay" word is stated there it's like you're digging your own grave.

Tu pun orang melayu tak boleh nak nampak lagi la. Jom le kite orang melayu ni sesame bukak mata, bukak hati da bukak otak kite ni. Sedarkan diri kite ni. Jangan sampai esok anak cucu kita ni jadi mangsa pasal kita sendiri yang salah. Kita biar bangsa kita bergaduh sesame sendiri. Bertelagah sesame sendiri. Bangsa lain tak rugi. Mereka ni dok tepuk tangan je. Mereka ni lagi dok tambag perencah je supaya orang melayu ni pecah belah. Lagi diorg suka. Lagi senang diorang ni nak jalan jarum diorg ni. Kita ni ibarat hamba kat tempat asal usul kita. Aku ni bukan la kaki politik. Tapi ni tempat aku membesar. Tpt darah bangsa aku mengalir. Da name pun Tanah Melayu sebelum ditukarkan ke Malaysia. Lepas da tuka ke Malaysia pun perkataan Melayu tu tak hilang lagi. Malay United.
Jangan sebab harta kite sanggup nak jual maruah bangsa da negara. Biar kita syahid untuk tanah air kite sendiri.
Aku bukan benci Malaysia. Aku sayang tanah air aku. Tapi sekarang ni aku tengok most of these idiotic people in Malaysia are making it much more worse then ever. Adoiiiii.... Sudah-sudah la tu. Ca Ya Nun Alif ni pun satu hal la.. Da menumpang tu buat la cara menumpang. You don't have any single right to blame our people. Our business is non of your damn bunsiness.

Terjemahan:
23 NOVEMBER 2011
11:28PM BUTTER LAU MEREKA DENGKI DENGAN KEJAYAAN ORANG LAIN. APA BEZANYA ORANG MELAYU DENGAN PENCURI?
24 NOVEMBER 2011
1:37AM DESMOND TEE DESMOND PERGI MATI MELAYU BABI! TAK ADA KELEBIHAN! JADI MEREKA MENCURI!! ORANG MELAYU LOWCLASS!!
2:49PM BECKY WONG TANPA ORANG CINA YANG MEMBANTU ORANG MELAYU, BOLEH KE MEREKA HIDUP SAMPAI SEKARANG? AMBIL BALIK DUIT YANG PERNAH KITA BAGI, SEMUA BABI-BABI INI TAK KAN MAMPU BUAT APA-APA. TAK LAMA LAGI MEREKA AKAN TAHU AKIBATNYA. MANA ADA 1 MALAYSIA, SEMUANYA TIPU! MEREKA SURUH TOLAK DISKRIMINASI KAUM TAPI MEREKA YANG MENGAMALKANNYA??
5:14PM STEVEN LONG MATILAH MELAYU BABI GEMUK MAK DIA!!
-------------------------------------------------
What the F*&% is this you damn communist inheritance. Just remember where are you standing now. Just remember where are you living now. Just remember where you came from. Don't just barging in like you know everything. As long as you in Malaysia. As long as it call Malaysia. As long as the "Malay" word is stated there it's like you're digging your own grave.

Tu pun orang melayu tak boleh nak nampak lagi la. Jom le kite orang melayu ni sesame bukak mata, bukak hati da bukak otak kite ni. Sedarkan diri kite ni. Jangan sampai esok anak cucu kita ni jadi mangsa pasal kita sendiri yang salah. Kita biar bangsa kita bergaduh sesame sendiri. Bertelagah sesame sendiri. Bangsa lain tak rugi. Mereka ni dok tepuk tangan je. Mereka ni lagi dok tambag perencah je supaya orang melayu ni pecah belah. Lagi diorg suka. Lagi senang diorang ni nak jalan jarum diorg ni. Kita ni ibarat hamba kat tempat asal usul kita. Aku ni bukan la kaki politik. Tapi ni tempat aku membesar. Tpt darah bangsa aku mengalir. Da name pun Tanah Melayu sebelum ditukarkan ke Malaysia. Lepas da tuka ke Malaysia pun perkataan Melayu tu tak hilang lagi. Malay United.
Jangan sebab harta kite sanggup nak jual maruah bangsa da negara. Biar kita syahid untuk tanah air kite sendiri.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
